Fall 2016 Achievement Expectations Report

University of Michigan
Greek Community
Achievement Expectations Program
2016 Fall Academic Semester-End Report

In August of 2013, our Achievement Expectations Program (AE) was launched.  The primary goal of this program is to evaluate the performance of all our chapters, and provide a community-wide picture of what is occurring in Greek Life.  The program has seven categories (Administrative, Academic, Community Service & Philanthropy, Chapter Development, Leadership, Community Building & Campus Engagement, and Risk Management). In each category we expect all organizations to meet specific targets by completing and submitting documents regarding their chapter’s activities, and participating in community programming.  Within the seven categories, there are ten subcategories on which each organization is reviewed. 

Key points and a baseline summary of the findings for Fall 2016 are as follows:

  • We believe chapters are doing many of the things outlined within the Achievement Expectations, but are simply not reporting the activities, thus creating gaps or incomplete categories – specifically in Community Service and Community Building & Engagement.

  • Academically, our chapters are very successful.
  • The three categories of highest completed participation are Administrative, Academics and Risk Management.

  • Participation varied greatly by council affiliation.

  • Although overall participation has seemingly increased this semester compared to last year, there is still need to improve overall participation.

  • We need assistance from advisors, consultants and inter/national officers to increase participation.

Summary

  • Two chapters met expectations in all seven categories compared to no chapters last year.

  • Three chapters met or exceeded expectations in nine of the ten subcategories

  • Only seven chapters met expectations in Community Service.

    60 of 64 chapters met the expectation of a chapter GPA of 2.75 or better with 48 chapters exceeding expectations with a chapter GPA of 3.20 or better.

    website.

This year the evaluation period was split into two semesters instead of covering a whole academic year in one report.  Each chapter has been asked to document their participation by the end of each semester.  This will allow for more effective tracking of trends half-way through the year, will reward and recognize positive outcomes more frequently, and will provide a framework for discussion when meeting with chapter leaders. 

 

Average participation in each subcategory by Council

Subcategory

Community

IFC

MGC

NPHC

Panhel

Administrative

88%

72%

93%

100%

88%

Academic Programming

80%

75%

83%

63%

100%

Academic GPA Requirement

All chapters have GPA’s so, no participation average is needed

Community Service

31%

9%

42%

13%

58%

Philanthropy

37%

20%

33%

13%

81%

Chapter Development

64%

65%

66%

35%

91%

Leadership

43%

30%

50%

19%

73%

Community Building and Engagement

32%

10%

46%

19%

52%

Risk Management Programming

71%

70%

86%

46%

80%

Risk Management Compliance

All chapters were evaluated so, no participation average is needed

 

Number of chapters meeting or exceeding expectations in each subcategory by Council

Subcategory

Community

64 orgs

IFC

28 orgs

MGC

12 orgs

NPHC

8 orgs

Panhel

16 orgs

Administrative

22

0

8

8

6

Academic Programming

52

21

10

5

16

Academic GPA Requirement

60

28

12

4

16

Community Service

7

1

4

0

2

Philanthropy

23

5

4

1

13

Chapter Development

17

2

5

0

10

Leadership

15

0

6

1

8

Community Building and Engagement

10

1

5

1

3

Risk Management Programming

25

11

9

2

3

Risk Management Compliance

47

13

12

7

15